Why may older workers have been systematically targeted for layoffs at Fresh Munchables?

Choosing the option about longer-tenured employees typically receiving higher compensation as the reason older workers may have been systematically targeted for layoffs highlights a common aspect of employment practices tied to compensation structures. In many organizations, employees with longer tenure tend to earn higher wages due to factors such as accrued experience, a deep understanding of the company's operations, and often, stronger loyalty because of their long service.

When organizations undergo layoffs, especially during financial downturns or restructuring initiatives, they often look for areas to reduce costs. Since older workers frequently have a higher salary due to their experience and tenure, laying off these employees may appear to be a straightforward method for the company to decrease payroll expenses significantly. This practice, however, can lead to principles of age discrimination and raise ethical and legal concerns in the context of employment law.

In contrast, other options present reasons that don't align with common employment trends. The idea that older workers typically have fewer skills contradicts many perceptions of experienced workers. The perspective regarding seniority affecting layoffs or fulfillment of job requirements does not typically justify targeting older employees in a rational economic decision-making process. Thus, the compensation angle indicates a clear financial motive behind the decision to target older workers, making this the most logical choice.