Which of the following will NOT enhance procedural justice?

Procedural justice refers to the perceived fairness of the processes that lead to outcomes. Enhancing procedural justice typically involves actions that promote transparency, consistency, and inclusivity in decision-making processes.

The option related to "Device strategy" does not inherently contribute to the fairness of procedures. While it may refer to the strategic use of technology or tools in implementing processes, it does not directly address the core elements that enhance participants' perception of fairness.

On the other hand, clear communication of procedures ensures that everyone understands how decisions are made, which is crucial for promoting transparency. Consistent application of rules helps in fostering fairness, as individuals can expect the same treatment in similar situations, which builds trust. Inclusive decision-making involves engaging multiple stakeholders, allowing diverse inputs, and ensuring that different perspectives are considered, which reinforces the idea that everyone has a voice in the process.

In contrast, a "Device strategy" may or may not include these aspects of fairness and can potentially lead to disparities if not aligned with the principles of procedural justice. Thus, it is the option that would not enhance procedural justice effectively.